Bewerbungen » hearing about decisions supposedly taken at that mee

DFS golf heads to Saint Simons Island, Georgia, this week for The RSM Classic. Last year, South Carolina native and University of Georgia product Kevin Kisner took home the victory, and he returns in 2016 looking for a chance to repeat.Our experts have put together the players they believe have the skills to succeed and provide big fantasy point totals. This weeks panel comprises Jason Sobel, Jonathan Coachman and Michael Collins as well as FantasyGolfInsiders Jeff Bergerson, Zach Turcotte, Taras Pitra and Jason Rouslin.Note: Golfer salaries listed are for DraftKings.Jason Sobel -- Zach Johnson ($9,700)Pick a resident, any resident. Sea Island is home to a growing percentage of PGA Tour professionals these days, which means plenty of guys in this weeks field will be sleeping in their own beds. Ill take Johnson, who hasnt won since last years Open Championship but should be due for another title soon.Michael Collins -- Matt Kuchar ($11,200)In the five times he has played this event, he has never finished outside the top 25. This is a home game for Kuchar, so this year playing on two courses (Seaside and Plantation) should give him just a slight advantage over many of the other players.Jonathan Coachman -- Zach Johnson ($9,700)This week I am going with someone who is always comfortable playing in this part of the country because he lives there -- Johnson. He hasnt had the year he would have wanted, but winning in the final event of 2016 can change all of that. And this week, he gets the job done.Taras Pitra -- Roberto Castro ($8,200)Castro has had a really good 2016 season and hasnt missed a cut in about four months. Many will look at his finishing position and price and go elsewhere, but I dont think thats a wise move this week. Hes a strong tee-to-green player who just needs the putter to show up in order to contend. Hes not really a flashy name in the industry, but hes a strong, high-upside candidate this week and should primarily be considered for tournaments.Jeff Bergerson -- Hudson Swafford ($7,700)One of the most difficult things to do in DFS golf is to get all six of your players through the cut, so when you can lock in a guy who has made 16 consecutive cuts, you do not hesitate. Although Swafford has not shown big upside, his price remains reasonable at $7,700 and allows you flexibility with the rest of your roster. A University of Georgia product, Swafford has missed two of three cuts in this event but did have a 12th-place finish in 2014. I would recommend utilizing Swafford mostly for cash-game purposes this week.Zach Turcotte -- Billy Horschel ($8,600)After playing a relaxed schedule last season, Horschel returned to the Tour this fall and promptly missed the cut a week ago in Mexico. Although it has been a number of years since his last stop in Sea Island, his game should fit well in this event. Hes a solid ball striker with balance on length, accuracy and hitting greens. After missing the cut last week, Horschel comes at a nice discount, and in a field this soft, hes a strong bounce-back play this week.Jason Rouslin -- Stewart Cink ($6,900)Stewart comes home to Sea Island Resort course off back-to-back 15th-place finishes. Im sure spending time at home with his wife, who is battling cancer, and coming in with some great recent form will give him all the extra motivation he needs. He has made the cut in only three of five starts here, so if you need reason not to roster him, thats it. I expect him to be around for the weekend and look for his first top 10 here in Georgia. Korbinian Holzer Ducks Jersey . -- The Sacramento Kings are set to become the first major professional sports franchise to accept Bitcoin virtual currency for ticket and merchandise purchases. Jakob Silfverberg Ducks Jersey .ca. Kerry, Just watched the shootout in the Coyotes/Leafs game and I have to ask, why was the James van Riemsdyk goal allowed to count? All of the video replays we were shown on TV were inconclusive about whether the puck had entirely crossed the line or not. http://www.authenticduckspro.com/Carter-rowney-ducks-jersey/ . How great will be revealed in the next couple of days at the board of governors meeting in Pebble Beach, Calif. Ryan Kesler Jersey .com) - Rafael Nadal, Andy Murray and Roger Federer were easy first-round winners Tuesday at the Australian Open. Adam Henrique Ducks Jersey . The Olympic champion curler and TSN curling analyst immediately went online to look at the Halls long list of honoured members. Thats when the enormity of the honour sunk in. The Supreme Court has told the BCCI to stop issuing funds to state associations that will not comply with the Lodha Committees recommendations. It told the board that no further money should be given unless the state association passes a resolution to implement the recommendations and submits an affidavit before the court.In an interim order issued on Friday, the court also said that funds disbursed by the BCCI to certain state associations after the boards annual general meeting in November 2015, should go into a fixed-term deposit until further directions.On Thursday, the court was told by amicus curiae Gopal Subramanium that the BCCI had disbursed substantial sums to state associations before putting in place a disbursement policy, which was one of the recommendations the board had to adopt by the September 30 deadline. Subramanium said the action was in defiance of the Lodha Committees directives.Kapil Sibal, the lawyer representing the BCCI, had said in his clients defence that the disbursement was an ordinary and routine matter and not forbidden by the Lodha Committee. The interim order said Sibal had revealed to the court that the BCCI had got INR 2500 crore as compensation from the broadcaster on account of termination of the Champions League T20, which was discontinued last year.Sibal had told the court that about INR 1500 crore went towards taxes and other liabilities, leaving BCCI with a net amount of Rs.1036.78 crore. He submitted that in terms of a decision taken in the AGM held on 09.11.2015, 70% of balance amount of Rs.718.24 crores was to be disbursed to 25 Associations in the country @ Rs.28.73 crores per Association, the order said. A sum of Rs.12 crores out of the said amount was released to each one of the Associations pursuant to the said resolution leaving the balance amount of Rs.16.73 crores unpaid.Subramanium contended that the disbursement of such large amounts was not a routine matter and was done on an ad-hoc basis with the intention to appease and possible induce the board members to oppose the Lodha Committee recommendations.In its order, the court said it did not want to take a final view on whether any action should be taken against the BCCI and its office bearers.However, the court found fault with the BCCIs position that it could not adopt the Memorandum of Association and Rules, a step that would signal it had adopted the Lodha Committees recommendations, because of the reluctance of state associations to do so.If that be the position, there is no reason why the State Associations that are opposed to the reforms suggested by Justice Lodha Committee and accepted by this Court should either expect or draw any benefit from the release of grants by the BCCI, the order said.Arvind Datar, another lawyer representing the BCCI, argued that only 13 state associations had received the balance amount of INR 16.73 crores each. The court said: No further amount in terms of the Resolution passed in AGM on 09.11.2015 or any subsequent resolution by the BCCI or its Working Committee shall be disbursed to any State Association except where the State Association concerned passes a proper resolution to the effect that it is agreeable to undertake and to support the reforms as proposed and accepted by this Court in letter and spirit.ddddddddddddSuch an unequivocal undertaking needed to be signed by the president of the state association and presented both to the Lodha Committee and the court.It is only after such affidavits are filed, that BCCI may transfer the balance amount of Rs.16.73 crores payable to the State Associations. As regards the 13 State Associations to whom the payment has already been disbursed, we direct that the State Associations concerned shall not appropriate the said amount except after they have passed a resolution and filed an affidavit as mentioned above before Justice Lodha Committee and before this Court. In case the affidavits are not filed, the amount disbursed to the State Associations shall be invested by the Associations in a term deposit subject to further directions of this Court.On October 1, the BCCI had held a Special General Meeting to consider the Lodha Committees recommendations and said it would only accept a selection of them. The board said it could not accept recommendations such as the age cap of 70 for office bearers, the nine-year limit for term of office broken into three, three-year terms with a cooling-off period between each term, and the one-state-one-vote policy. These recommendations, the BCCI said, had not been accepted by the boards members - the state associations.It later emerged that the BCCI had also held an emergent working committee meeting on September 30. After hearing about decisions supposedly taken at that meeting, the Lodha Committee directed two banks to stop two specific transfers to the state associations because the BCCI had not put in place the new fund disbursement policy.The BCCI responded by claiming the ongoing India-New Zealand series was under threat because the Lodha Committee had frozen its accounts. The committee said it had done no such thing and issued a clarification to banks to not freeze the boards accounts in total. However, several of the transfers the Lodha Committee had objected to had already been made, which prompted the committee to issue a directive to the states telling them not to touch these funds or risk being in contempt of court.These events culminated in the hearing on October 6, when a three-judge bench headed by Chief Justice of India TS Thakur gave the BCCI a day to agree to fall in line with the Lodha Committees recommendations. On Friday, however, the hearing was deferred to October 17 but the interim order was damaging to the financial future of the state associations, unless they adopted the Lodha Committee recommendations. ' ' '